Sherman

(PC) Evans v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20191:19-cv-00818California790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD A. EVANS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00818-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF No. 16) S. SHERMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Richard A. Evans is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on June 12, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On June 18, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full in order to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 7.) On August 6, 2019, the undersigned issued an order adopting the findings and recommendations in full, denying Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordering Plaintiff to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full within twenty-one (21) days from the date 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.