Rivers

Rivers v. Wright

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20191:19-cv-00916California3,866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SHERMARRIE RIVERS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00916-DAD-BAM Plaintiff FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO OBEY A

DONECIA WRIGHT, et al., COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. No. 7)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Background Plaintiff Shermarrie Rivers (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (Doc. No. 1.) On October 8, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and granted her leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days. (Doc. No. 7.) Plaintiff was warned expressly that if she failed to comply with the Court’s order, then the Court would recommend dismissal of this action. (Id. at 9.) More than thirty (30) days have passed and no amended complaint has been filed. /// /// II. Failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.