Manter

Manter v. Fresno Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20191:19-cv-01070California3,179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL J. MANTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01070-DAD-EPG

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED, WITH

v. PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

14 FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et (ECF Nos. 1, 5, 6) al.,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

17 18 Plaintiff, Michael J. Manter, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 5, 2019, Plaintiff commenced this action by the filing of a Complaint alleging claims against the Fresno Police Department and the City Hall of Fresno. (ECF No. 1.) On October 15, 2019, the Court entered a screening order finding that the Complaint fails to state any claim upon which relief can be granted. (Id.) The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days from the date of service of the screening order to file an amended complaint or to notify the Court that he wishes to stand on the Complaint, subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.