(PS) Benoist v. Veterans Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20192:18-cv-01611California408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NOEL BENOIST, No. 2:18-CV-01611-MCE-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. 16 On September 16, 2019, the Court dismissed this action without further leave to amend. (ECF No. 28.) On October 29, 2019, Plaintiff, who had proceeded without counsel and in forma pauperis in the district court, filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 31.) Thereafter, on November 8, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this matter to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal, or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. (ECF No. 34.) “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of in forma pauperis status appropriate where…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.