Hlaing

(PC) White v. Hlaing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20192:19-cv-00462California434 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TYRANE LEE WHITE, No. 2:19-cv-0462-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MIN HLAING, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 30, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). ECF No. 9. The court directed plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit. After reviewing a May 20, 2019 letter filed by plaintiff, the court directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint and granted him thirty days in which to do so. The order warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint could result in the dismissal of this action. Despite being granted two extensions of time, the time for acting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.