(PS) Bershell v. Loomis, Gardner and Brinks Armoured

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOUIS E. BERSHELL, JR., No. 2:19-cv-02143-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER LOOMIS, GARDNER AND BRINKS ARMOURED, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. (See ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff’s second motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 3, will be denied as moot. The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune…