(PS)Duncan

(PS)Duncan v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20192:19-cv-02250California1,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA DUNCAN, No. 2:19-cv-02250-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. 16 I. Background and Allegations Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has paid the filing fee for this action. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff asserts claims against the United States under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 351–364. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that a judge “failed to provide or allow for the assistance of a disability advocate and auxiliary devices during all court proceedings,” “[f]ailed to keep private or confidential the request for ADA assistance,” and “[f]ailed to comply with the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act.” (Id.) //// //// II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.