Pulido

(PC) Kasey F. Hoffman v. Pulido

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20191:18-cv-00209California3,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KASEY F. HOFFMANN, Case No. 1:18-cv-00209-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS DESIRE

TO PROCEED ONLY ON RETALIATION

L. PULIDO, et al., AND DUE PROCESS CLAIMS AND TO

SEEK ONLY DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF

Defendants. GOOD-TIME CREDITS AND PUNITIVE

DAMAGES

16 (Doc. 1) 17 21-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Kasey F. Hoffmann, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. (Doc. 1 at 1.) Plaintiff alleges that the defendants denied him a kosher diet in violation of the First Amendment, issued a false rules violation report (RVR) in retaliation for his engagement in protected activity, and denied him the ability to present witnesses at his RVR hearing in violation of the Due Process Clause. (Id. at 3- 5.) Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages for the loss of good-time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.