Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20191:19-cv-00138California968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KYLE PETERSEN , ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY THE v. ) UNITED STATES MARSHAL WITHOUT

PREPAYMENT OF COSTS

ANTHONY SIMS, JR., and NICHOLAS )

TORRES, )

Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). In an order entered on October 23, 2019, the Court found service of the Third Amended Complaint, as supplemented, to be appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward the following documents to the U.S. Marshal: a) One completed and issued summons for each individual to be served; 23 b) One completed USM−285 form for each individual to be served; 24 c) One copy of the Third Amended Complaint filed on April 22, 2019…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.