(PS) McColm v. Trinity County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICIA A. McCOLM, No. 2:12-cv-01984 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

TRINITY COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to vacate the undersigned’s order disregarding plaintiff’s post-judgment motion to amend, which advised plaintiff that because the case is closed, no further filings would be considered. ECF No. 57. Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and accordingly this motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). In the request, plaintiff clarifies that her “motion to amend” is in fact a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion to vacate (ECF No. 57) is GRANTED and the undersigned recommends plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 55) be DENIED. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY …