Hony

(PS) Boutros v. Hony

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20192:19-cv-01080California2,170 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE BOUTROS, No. 2:19-CV-1080-JAM-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CORY HONY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before the court are: (1) plaintiff’s motion for an “emergency restraining order” (ECF No. 8); (2) defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 23); and (3) defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 24). 21 I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS This action proceeds on plaintiff’s original complaint. Plaintiff names the following as defendants: (1) Cory Hony, the Butte County Sheriff; (2) J.D. Jones, the Butte County Undersheriff; (3) Smith, a Butte County Deputy Sheriff; and (4) Dick Ramsey, the Butte County District Attorney. 27 The court was not required to screen plaintiff’s pro se complaint because he paid the filing fees and is not proceeding in forma pauperis. Plaintiff states that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.