Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20191:19-cv-00138California692 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 KYLE PETERSEN , Case No.: 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR VERIFICATION THAT CASE IS ONGOING

ANTHONY SIMS, JR., and NICHOLAS (ECF No. 31)

TORRES,

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff has filed a request for the Court to verify that this case is active and ongoing (ECF No. 31). Plaintiff explains that he needs such verification in order to access the law library and other legal resources he needs to prosecute this action (id.). The Court previously issued a Screening Order finding that the Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9), as supplemented (ECF No. 13), stated cognizable claims against Defendants; finding service of the Third Amended Complaint, as supplemented, to be appropriate; and requiring Plaintiff to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.