Zetz

Zetz v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20191:19-cv-00451California354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUTUMN ZETZ, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00451-AWI-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH NOVEMBER 15, 2019

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, ORDER

Defendant. (ECF No. 33)

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

15 On November 15, 2019, Plaintiffs’ request to seal their initial disclosures that were 16 mistakenly filed in this action was granted. (ECF No. 33.) The order provided that “[u]pon 17 receipt of this order, Plaintiffs SHALL FILE the motion to seal documents, with the exception of 18 Exhibit A attached to the declaration of Taylor French. See L.R. 141(e).” The order issued on 19 November 15, 2019, and Plaintiffs have not filed the motion to seal as directed. 20 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 21 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 22 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.