Johnston
Johnston v. Merced District Attorney's Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 TYRONE JOHNSTON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00926-AWI-EPG 11 Plaintiff, S CREENING ORDER v. O RDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;
MERCED DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OR
OFFICE, et al., (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES Defendants. TO STAND ON HIS COMPLAINT, SUBJECT
TO THE COURT ISSUING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO A DISTRICT
JUDGE CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER
18 (ECF NO. 1)
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
21 Plaintiff, Tyrone Johnston, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this action on July 8, 2019, by filing a complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging law enforcement misconduct. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s Complaint is before the Court for screening. The Court finds that the Complaint fails to state any cognizable claim. After Plaintiff reviews this order, Plaintiff can decide to file an amended complaint, which states clearly what each person did and why he believes it violates his constitutional 28 …