Baker

(PC) Garrett v. Baker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20192:16-cv-01336California1,689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ALLEN GARRETT, No. 2:16-cv-1336 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed eight motions for preliminary injunction. ECF Nos. 76, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 88, 90.1 I. Plaintiff’s Allegations The complaint alleges that defendants Baker and Masterson violated plaintiff’s rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. ECF No. 1 at 4. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that defendant Baker denied him due process when he refused to call plaintiff’s psychiatric doctor during the hearing on his rules violation, and that Baker intentionally gives out disparate punishment to prisoners who suffer from mental illness. Id. Defendant Masterson also allegedly discriminated 26 Plaintiff’s motions to compel (ECF No. 63), for a settlement conference (ECF No. 66), a pretrial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.