Pringle

Pringle v. Cardall

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20192:18-cv-02035California687 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 PAMELA DENISE PRINGLE, No. 2:18-cv-02035 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

CERTIFICATION OF RULING AS

BRENT CARDALL, COUNTY OF YOLO, FINAL JUDGMENT

YOLO COUNTY PROBATION

DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY PENNELLA,

SANDY JONES, JUDY MESICK, NOEL

BARLOW-HUST, CINDY McDONALD,

MARK ALAN KUBINSKI, ELISA SUE

MAGNUSON, JOHN DOES 1-20, and JANE DOES 1-20, inclusive, 19 Defendants.

21 ----oo0oo---- 22 Plaintiff Pamela Denise Pringle sued both Idaho and 23 California defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 asserting violation 24 of her civil rights while serving her prison sentence in Idaho 25 and upon her release. (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) (Docket No. 7).) 26 Defendants Sandy Jones, Amanda Gentry, Noel Barlow-Hust, Judy 27 Mesick, Cindy McDonald, Mark Alan Kubinski, and Elisa Sue 28 Magnuson (collectively “Idaho defendants”) moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue on August 28, 2019. (Mot. to Dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.