Baker

(PC) Garrett v. Baker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20192:16-cv-01336California6,179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ALLEN GARRETT, No. 2:16-cv-1336 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion to compel discovery (ECF No. 63), which defendants oppose (ECF No. 68). He has also filed motions for a settlement conference (ECF No. 66), a pretrial conference (ECF No. 67), separate trials (ECF No. 69), reconsideration (ECF No. 71), for discovery (ECF No. 73), and for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 86, 96). Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 93. I. Plaintiff’s Allegations The complaint alleges that defendants Baker and Masterson violated plaintiff’s rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. ECF No. 1 at 4. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that defendant Baker denied him due process when he refused to call plaintiff’s psychiatric doctor during the 27 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.