LLoyd

(PS) Alston v. LLoyd

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20192:18-cv-02420California297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, JR., No. 2:18-cv-02420-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Eric Anthony Alston, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 30, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 41.) Neither party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.