Furia

Furia v. Hirsch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20192:19-cv-00942California2,008 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ADREW FURIA, an individual, No. 2:19-cv-00942-JAM-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING WELLS FARGO BANK

AND BANK OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO

SUSAN MARIE MCGREW, an INTERVENE individual; LAURIE HIRSCH, an individual; PHYRHYDRO, LLC, a Nevada corporation; WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION; BANK OF AMERICA,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 Proposed intervenors, Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) (collectively, “the Banks”), possess disputed funds at the heart of this litigation. Accordingly, the Banks seek to jointly intervene to file counterclaims and crossclaims in interpleader for the purpose of determining the rightful ownership of the disputed funds. Motion to Intervene (“Mot.”), ECF. No. 20. Defendant Laurie Hirsch (“Hirsch”), sister of Susan Marie McGrew (the party accused by Plaintiff of originally misappropriating the funds), opposes this Motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.