Malmquist

(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Malmquist

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20192:19-cv-01520California300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:19-cv-01520-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GARY MALMQUIST, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above- entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 17, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.