(PS) Expose v. Fay Servicing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LINDA ROSE EXPOSE, No. 2:19-cv-01866-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 2, 7, 13, 16) FAY SERVICING, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Linda Rose Expose (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action on September 17, 2019. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 6, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School…