Griswold
(PS) Sharma v. Griswold
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NARENDRA SHARMA, No. 2:19–cv–1731–MCE–KJN (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND
SETTING NEW BRIEFING SCHEDULE,
v. AND
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD, (ECF No. 10) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff filed an action against Defendant on September 3, 2019, and filed a first amended complaint on October 17. (ECF Nos. 1, 6.) On November 1, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, setting the matter for a hearing on December 5. (ECF No. 10.) Under the Court’s local rules, Plaintiff was obligated to file his opposition (or statement of non–opposition) by November 22. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed (or continued) hearing date. A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect,…