Brown

(PC) Consiglio v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20191:16-cv-01268California1,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAM CONSIGLIO, JR., Case No. 1:16-cv-01268-AWI-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

v. WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., ON THE PLEADINGS, AND DISMISSING

THE INSTANT ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 67, 73, 75, 77) 16 Plaintiff Sam Consiglio, Jr. is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants Pamela Ahlin and Brandon Price, in their official capacities, that California Code of Regulations, title 9, §§ 891 and 4350 amount to punishment in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment as alleged in his complaint. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 12, 25.) On March 19, 2019, Defendants filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.