Pfeiffer

(PC) Yates v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20191:19-cv-00641California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY YATES, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00641-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., ) COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 10] ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Anthony Yates is appearing pro se in and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 23, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that the instant action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief and amendment would be futile. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within fourteen days. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.