Wright

Wright v. USAA Savings Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20192:19-cv-00591California808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 CHARLES WRIGHT, No. 2:19-cv-00591 WBS CKD Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE

USAA SAVINGS BANK and USAA PLAINTIFF

FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,

16 Defendants.

18 ----oo0oo---- 19 Plaintiff Charles Wright brought this action against 20 defendants USAA Savings Bank and USAA Federal Savings Bank 21 alleging violations of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection 22 Practices Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1788, et seq., and the Telephone 23 Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. Wright 24 died shortly thereafter. Defendants then filed a Notice of 25 Suggestion of Death of Plaintiff. (Docket No. 12.) Before the 26 court is plaintiff’s motion to substitute Vanessa Wright, 27 plaintiff’s wife and representative of plaintiff’s estate (id.), 28 as plaintiff. (Docket No. 18.) I. Legal Standard Federal law governs a motion for substitution following a party’s death. See In re…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.