Casanova

(PC) Williams v. Casanova

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20191:17-cv-00917California1,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT C. WILLIAMS, Case No.: 1:17-cv-00917-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

v. RESPONSE TO PRODUCTION REQUESTS

RUBEN CASANOVA, et al., (Doc. 35) Defendants.

16 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) and Local Rule 230(l), Defendant Chase moves for an order compelling Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s request for production of documents, set one. (Doc. 35.) Defendant propounded the production requests, plus interrogatories and requests for admission, on July 12, 2019, (Doc. 35 at 2, 4). To date, Plaintiff has not responded to any of the discovery requests. (Id.) Plaintiff has not filed any opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion; and, the time to do so has passed. Local Rule 230(l). The Court thus deems the motion submitted. I. BACKGROUND a. Plaintiff’s Allegations Plaintiff Williams is civilly detained at Coalinga…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.