(PC) Dustin v. Kern Valley State Prison Personnel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20191:19-cv-00989California1,026 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DALE OWEN DUSTIN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00989-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND REQUIRING

KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE TO

PERSONNEL, PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION

15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 15, 16)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Dale Owen Dustin is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 6, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full in order to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 16.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.