Mendoza

Mendoza v. Macy's Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20191:19-cv-01156California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RENEE C. MENDOZA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01156-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED MACY’S INC., FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER

Defendant. (Doc. 6)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

15 On August 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this case against Defendant. (Doc. 1.) 16 Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on September 4, 2019. 17 (Docs. 2, 3.) 18 On September 20, 2019, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed 19 to state any cognizable claims and granting leave until October 11, 2019, for Plaintiff to file an 20 amended complaint. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time in which to file her 21 amended complaint, and the Court granted the request and allowed Plaintiff until November 22, 22 2019, to file her amended complaint. (Docs. 5, 6.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.