(PS) Shackelford v. Virtu Investments

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20192:16-cv-01601California738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAWNE C. SHACKELFORD, No. 2:16-cv-01601-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER VIRTU INVESTMENTS, LLC, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Dawne C. Shackelford (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings the instant action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 3, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 15.) On October 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 16.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.