(PS) Strojnik v. Azul Hospitality Group, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER STROJNIK, No. 2:19-cv-01877-TLN-AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AZUL HOSOPITALITY GROUP, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, but he is licensed as an attorney in the state of California; pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pending is a motion to dismiss from defendant Azul Hospitality Group, LLC (“Azul”). ECF No. 6. Defendant McConnell Foundation has not been served. Plaintiff has responded to the motion. ECF No. 9. Defendant has not submitted reply briefing. Defendant has made requests for judicial notice which the court deems appropriate to resolve here. Based on a review of the record, the court has determined that Defendant’s proffered declarations and exhibits are not appropriate for judicial notice in relation to a motion to dismiss, and Azul’s motion must be construed as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule…