Dickey

(PC) Campbell v. Dickey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20191:14-cv-00918California320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY TYRONE CAMPBELL, SR., Case No. 1:14-cv-00918-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

P. DICKEY, (ECF No. 61) Defendant.

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Anthony Tyrone Campbell, Sr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 24, 2019, Defendant P. Dickey filed and served a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 61.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir.1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th Cir.1988). (ECF No. 61-5.) Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was due on or before November 18, 2019. However, Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.