Soa

(PC) Damon Newquist v. Soa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20191:17-cv-01150California1,672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAMON NEWQUIST, 1:17-cv-01150-LJO-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

v. DEPOSITION AND RESPONSE TO

WRITTEN DISCOVERY REQUESTS

SOA, et al., (Doc. 38) Defendants.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

17 21-DAY DEADLINE

19 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) and Local Rule 230(l), Defendants Chen and Soa move for an order compelling Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ interrogatories, set one; requests for production of documents, set one; and requests for admissions, set one. (Doc. 38 at 1.) Defendants propounded the discovery requests on August 9, 2019, and to date, Plaintiff has not responded to any of the requests. (Id. at 7.) Defendants further move for an order compelling Plaintiff to appear for his deposition. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff failed to appear for his duly noticed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.