Shillinger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 MAYNARD EDRALIN BUMAGAT, No. 2:17-cv-02008-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 86, 91) TERRY SCHILLINGER, et. al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Maynard Edralin Bumagat (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above- entitled action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 7, 2019 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 91.) Neither party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.…