(PS)Loftus

(PS)Loftus v. AT&T, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20192:18-cv-02866California350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT C. LOFTUS, JR., No. 2:18-cv-02866-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER AT&T, INC., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Robert C. Loftus, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated the instant action, which was removed to this Court on October 26, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 20, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Findings and Recommendations.1 ///

Plaintiff has, however, filed a Notice of Interlocutory Appeal as to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 23.) The Ninth Circuit dismissed Plaintiff’s interlocutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.