Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND BALDHOSKY, Case No. 1:12-cv-01200-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER ATTACHING JURY

INSTRUCTIONS

. OBJECTIONS DUE BY FRIDAY, SUSAN HUBBARD, et al., DECEMBER 6, 2019 Defendants.

Attached are the court’s jury instructions. The instructions are based on the parties’ jointly proposed jury instructions, ECF No. 236, which I understand come largely from the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions. I have included the first of defendants’ separate proposed jury instructions, to which plaintiff no longer objects. See ECF No. 240 at 3 and ECF No. 254. I have not included plaintiff's separately proposed instruction or defendant’s second separately proposed instruction. See ECF No. 238 and ECF No. 240 at 4. Plaintiffs separate instruction on wealth seems intended for use in state court when punitive damages are not at issue, see ECF No. 238 at 6, and defendants’ instruction on causation seems geared specifically toward Monell claims, see City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 391-92 (1989). Objections are due by the close of business on…