Nawabi

Nawabi v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20191:13-cv-00272California1,960 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IDRIS NAWABI, Case No. 1:13-cv-00272-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

CATES, et al., (ECF No. 81)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

16 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Idis Nawabi, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 25, 2013. On February 20, 2014, the magistrate assigned to the action dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on March 6, 2014. On March 11, 2014, the magistrate judge screened the first amended complaint and found that it stated a claim against J. Hartley, R. Chapnick, B. Borges and Hancock for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment and service was initiated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.