Hamlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID MICHAEL REINHARDT, 1:19-cv-00892-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SERVE

COMPLAINT

v.

W. KENT HAMLIN, et al., (Doc. 18)

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

(Doc. 27)

14-DAY DEADLINE

Clerk of Court to Assign a District Judge 20 Plaintiff David Michael Reinhardt, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, alleges that California judges and justices are engaged in a conspiracy to deny his constitutional rights by repeatedly denying his state habeas petitions. (Doc. 27 at 11.) In its first screening order, the Court was unable to discern whether Plaintiff intended to file a section 1983 action or a federal habeas petition.1 (Doc. 14). Thus, the Court provided Plaintiff with the pleading requirements for both types of actions and granted him leave to amend. (Id.) Plaintiff chose to file

1 Plaintiff…