Frauenheim

(HC) Moore v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20192:19-cv-00155California20,480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN JUDSON MOORE, No. 2:19-cv-155-WBS-EFB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Respondent.

Petitioner is a California state prisoner who, proceeding with counsel, brings an

application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He was convicted in the

Solano County Superior Court of second degree murder (Pen. Code § 187, subd. (a)) and firearm

enhancements (§§ 12022.53 (b)-(d)). The instant habeas petition raises three claims. First,

petitioner argues that the state court erred when it concluded that his constitutional rights were not

violated in light of a juror’s prejudicial statements during deliberations. Second, he argues that

the state court of appeal unreasonably concluded that the jury’s discussions regarding his failure

to testify did not amount to federal constitutional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.