Barrera

(PC) Samaro v. Barrera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20192:19-cv-01690California392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR FERNANDO SAMARO, No. 2:19-cv-1690 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BARRERA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 5, 2019, the undersigned directed plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days. See ECF No. 3. At that time, plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. See id. at 2. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has neither filed an application nor responded to the court’s order in any way. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110 permit the sanction of dismissal of an action for failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.