Maldinado

(PC) Jacobsen v. Maldinado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20191:17-cv-00101California681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JACOBSEN, Case No. 1:17-cv-00101-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN

CASE

v. (ECF No. 58) MALDINADO, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Michael Jacobsen (“Plaintiff”) is a former county detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties in this action consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 54.) On February 14, 2018, Defendant Maldinado filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. (ECF No. 40.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on February 27, 2018, (ECF No. 41), and Defendant filed a reply on March 5, 2018, (ECF No. 43). On September 25, 2018, the Court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and judgment was entered accordingly the same day. (ECF Nos. 56, 57.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion seeking to set aside the dismissal of this action, “due to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.