Matevousian

(PC) Pitts v. Matevousian

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20191:19-cv-01029California696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDGAR NELSON PITTS, 1:19-cv-01029-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO

vs. OBEY COURT ORDERS (ECF Nos. 3, 8.) ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et al.,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN TWENTY

Defendants. (20) DAYS

19 On July 30, 2019 and September 18, 2019, the court issued orders requiring Plaintiff to complete the court’s consent/decline form indicating whether he consents to or declines Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, and return the form to the court within thirty days. (ECF Nos. 3, 8.) The thirty-day time periods have now expired and Plaintiff has not returned the court’s consent/decline form. In determining whether to dismiss this action for failure to comply with the directives set forth in its order, “the Court must weigh the following factors: (1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.