Hubard

(PC) Penton v. Hubard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20192:11-cv-00518California12,678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY PENTON, No. 2:11-cv-0518 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

L. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action. Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings1 was noticed for hearing on November 21, 2019, before the undersigned. Because oral argument was not of material assistance, the hearing was vacated, and the matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, and good cause appearing therefor, the undersigned finds and recommends that defendants’ motions be granted in part and denied in part. I. Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint In his first cause of action, plaintiff alleges that defendants Bradford, Morrow, Johnson, Walker, Virga, Donahoo, Nunez, Gaddi, Quinn, Pool and Does 1-11 violated plaintiff’s right to 26 Defendant Nunez has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.