(SS) Ros v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20192:15-cv-02389California1,364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARETH ROS, No. 2:15-cv-2389 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff brought this action seeking judicial review of a final administrative decision denying an application for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. By order filed March 7, 2017, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was granted, the decision of the Commissioner was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings.2 (ECF No. 22.) ////

24 1 Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on June 17, 2019. See https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on July 30, 2019). Accordingly, Andrew Saul is substituted in as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.