(PS) Harticon v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HARTICON, No. 2:18-cv-0277 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., et al, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff William Harticon is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 29.) On September 12, 2019, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 33.) The motion was noticed for hearing before the undersigned on November 1, 2019. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiff was to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion “not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” Plaintiff, however, failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Accordingly, on October 28, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause, ordering plaintiff to show cause in writing within fourteen days…