Yith

Yith v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20191:14-cv-01875California4,035 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 SEANLIM YITH and SEAK LEANG Case No. 1:14-CV-01875-LJO-SKO YITH,

Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS IN

v. LIMINE

CHAD F. WOLF, et al., Bench Trial: January 7, 2020

Defendants.

15 On November 13, 2019, Plaintiffs Seanlim Yith and Seak Leang Yith (“Plaintiffs”) filed three 16 substantively related motions in limine. ECF No. 120. On November 22, 2019, Defendants1 filed their 17 opposition to the motions. The bench trial is set for January 7, 2019, and is estimated to take one to two 18 (1-2) days. ECF No. 119 at 2. The matter is before the Court pursuant to 8 U.S.C § 1447(b) due to United 19 States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”) failure to make a determination on Plaintiffs’ 20 naturalization applications within 120 days after the Plaintiffs’ examination.2 Plaintiffs are siblings and

22 1Defendants in this matter are Chad F. Wolf, in his capacity as Acting Secretary for Department of Homeland Security; Kenneth T.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.