Haynes

(PC) Moultrie v. Haynes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20191:18-cv-01555California470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE LAFON MOULTRIE, Case No. 1:18-cv-01555-LJO-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

HAYNES, et al., (Doc. 14) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Andre Lafon Moultrie is an inmate in county jail proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 19, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss this action because Plaintiff fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff filed objections on December 2, 2019. (Doc. 15.) In his objections, Plaintiff states that he misunderstood the requirements for his complaint, and he requests further opportunity to amend. (Id.). Plaintiff does not address the substance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.