Sherman
(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM SHARPE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00711-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN CLAIMS v. AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED 14 STU SHERMAN, et al., (ECF NOS. 1 & 11)
15 Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE
20 Adam Sharpe (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 21 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 22 Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on May 21, 2019, (ECF No. 1.) The 23 Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 11.) The Court found that only the following 24 claims should proceed past the screening stage: “deliberate indifference to serious medical needs 25 in violation of the Eighth Amendment against C. Cryer, J. Lewis, and S. Gates, as well as a claim 26 for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment…