(HC) Ragan v. Richardson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20192:18-cv-00410California367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL RAGAN, No. 2: 18-cv-0410 JAM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER RICHARDSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In this action, petitioner challenges his 2010 convictions for which he was sentenced to 181 years-to-life. Pending before the court is petitioner’s motion to stay this action in order to exhaust an additional claim. (ECF No. 17.) On November 21, 2019, petitioner filed a notice of exhaustion. (ECF No. 35.) Petitioner is proceeding with another habeas corpus action in this court. 2:17-cv-1924 KJN P, challenging his 2010 convictions. On October 30, 2017, the undersigned stayed 17-cv- 1924, pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition in case 17-1924 raising all his exhausted claims. See Woods v. Carey, 525 F.3d 886, 888 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.