Vargas

Vargas v. Binnewies

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20191:16-cv-01240California173 words

Trial Court Opinion

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ESTATE OF ARMANDO VARGAS, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01240-DAD-EPG Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR

v. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE

DOUG BINNEWIES, et al., Defendants. (ECF No. 86) 16 Plaintiff, Estate of Armando Vargas and Gloria Redondo, and Defendants, Doug 18 Binnewies, Codie Hart, Julia Patterson, Deputy Cooper, Deputy Reeder, Deputy Day, Deputy 19 Detrich, and Deputy Jay, have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice 20 (ECF No. 86). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. 21 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 22 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 23

T IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: December 9, 2019 [sl ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28