Perdue

(PS) Leskinen v. Perdue

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20192:18-cv-00453California514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA LESKINEN, No. 2:18-cv-453-TLN-KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. ON APPEAL SONNY PERDUE, Secretary of the United (ECF No. 74.) States Department of Agriculture, 15 Defendant. 16 On June 21, 2019, the undersigned recommended that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted in full on Plaintiff’s Title VII claims (ECF No. 65). The district court adopted these findings and recommendations and entered judgment in favor of Defendant. (ECF Nos. 70, 71.) Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis before the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 74.) This is Plaintiff’s first IFP request. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24, “a party to a district-court action who desires to appeal in forma pauperis must file a motion in the district court.” Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The rule requires the party attach an affidavit that “(A) shows .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.